the warriors movie would have been better in chicago?

For comments about The Warriors that don't fit in the categories above.
superdooper
Rank: New Blood
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 5:52 pm

the warriors movie would have been better in chicago?

Post by superdooper »

I THINK THAT CHICAGO GANGS ARE MUCHS INTERESTING THEN NYC CHICAGO STREETGANGS WERE KNOWN TO WEAR COLORS AND GANG SWEATERS WHICH ARE PRETTY COOL.
Last edited by Anonymous on Wed Jul 18, 2007 2:44 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
turnbull_badger
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 1053
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 5:58 pm
Location: South west London

Re: the warriors movie would have been better in chicago?

Post by turnbull_badger »

no, i think that NY was perfect for the warriors, i think it where the book is set and it was a gang infested city at the time
[img]http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j189/turnbull123/turnballbadger.jpg[/img]

User avatar
GramercyRiff99
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 749
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 2:22 am

Re: the warriors movie would have been better in chicago?

Post by GramercyRiff99 »

Yeah, Chicago would be terrible for this sort of thing just because of the layout. New York is incredibly long from the far northern areas to the far southern areas, while Chicago is just a big blob. Also, New York has a cooler subway system.

Peasa
Rank: Lizzie
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 11:30 am

Re: the warriors movie would have been better in chicago?

Post by Peasa »

New York is perfect you couldn't get a more brilliant setting for a movie like the Warriors.

User avatar
Baby Bear
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 1252
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 4:12 am
Location: Chicago
Contact:

Re: the warriors movie would have been better in chicago?

Post by Baby Bear »

superdooper wrote: I THINK THAT CHICAGO GANGS ARE MUCHS INTERESTING THEN NYC CHICAGO STREETGANGS WERE KNOWN TO WEAR COLORS AND GANG SWEATERS WHICH ARE PRETTY COOL THE IMPERIAL GANGSTER WITH THERE CROWNS AND PINK PANTHERS. THEN WE HAVE THE LATIN KINGS THE LATIN LOVER,TWO SIX BOYS, SYMON CITY ROYALS,PLAYBOYS,HARRISON GENTS, SPANISH COBRAS,18 STREET BOYS,JOUSTERS,VICELORDS,GANGSTER DISCIPLES, SATAN DISCIPLES,SPANISHLORDS , CHI WEST,LATIN PANTHERS,DUECES, ETC.ALL THESE GANGS ARE MORE INTERESTING CAUSE THEY HAD THEIR RULES AND THEIR OWN DIFFERENT IDEOLOGIESEACH GANG HAD A PRESIDENT,VICE PRESIDENTS,THEIR OWN COLORS,THEIR OWN SWEATERS,
Yeah and u can't forget they are bringing back the Black Stone Rangers and The Black Panthers. Who thought a gang from the 1960s would be back. This time im sure it wouldn't be helping young african americans getting a education. Its all about fighting and selling drugs.

stevo2k6
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 1409
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 11:45 pm
Location: burnley england
Contact:

Re: the warriors movie would have been better in chicago?

Post by stevo2k6 »

no point in replying to him he made the topic a year ago and probs hasnt been on since lol
S.Ritson

adam88
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 1474
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 5:04 pm

Re: the warriors movie would have been better in chicago?

Post by adam88 »

Anyway, he not supposed to be talking about real gang activity.  The reality of the warriors movie, is perfect withought adding real life situations.

User avatar
Lion
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3172
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:20 pm
Location: Texas

Re: the warriors movie would have been better in chicago?

Post by Lion »

O.k.  I was just about to ban this cat, but he hasn't posted since.  New York is just fine.  As we know, they are going to try Los Angeles, but that's has flopp writen all over it.  Oh and these are fictional gangs not real gangs.
[img]http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b232/METALTANK/squares.jpg[/img]

User avatar
The Swan
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 1919
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 10:14 pm
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: the warriors movie would have been better in chicago?

Post by The Swan »

Ye New York was perfect 4 the movie, I think it's not only a gangs&colurs problem... The City was/is really the right enviroment 4 it!!! I don't think L.A. will be the same, too! 8)
[color=#FF0000][align=center]Wanna Fight? Make Your Move![/align][/color]
[align=center][img]http://digilander.libero.it/ran.s/HoustonTheSwanLogo.jpg[/img][/align]
[color=#FF0000][align=center]"That's cause u guys r so bad they're afraid of u!!!"[/align][/color]

User avatar
theSleepiLizzie_of_2006
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 379
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 2:23 pm
Location: Queens, NY
Contact:

Re: the warriors movie would have been better in chicago?

Post by theSleepiLizzie_of_2006 »

:shock: Is this person absolutely mental...insane...out of his mind?!?!? The Warriors in Chicago?!?!? I don't know much about Chicago but I can say one thing...their subway system isn't as great and huge; graffiti was the art that defined New York City in so many ways...NYC was known for that...maybe there are/were more gangs in Chicago but NYC was crazy back then...crazy enough for it to be the perfect setting for The Warriors


gee...I wonder what made this guy create this thread and run off...
Last edited by theSleepiLizzie_of_2006 on Sun Sep 16, 2007 7:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
[img]http://i139.photobucket.com/albums/q302/SleepiTsu27/Untitled2.jpg[/img]
~this chic is packed...

User avatar
ajax the warrior
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 692
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 10:33 pm
Location: queensland australia

Re: the warriors movie would have been better in chicago?

Post by ajax the warrior »

No the warriors was perfect in new york and dont post in capital letters.
Im a little teapot short and stout

User avatar
The Swan
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 1919
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 10:14 pm
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: the warriors movie would have been better in chicago?

Post by The Swan »

theSleepiLizzie_of_2006 wrote: :shock: Is this person absolutely mental...insane...out of his mind?!?!? The Warriors in Chicago?!?!? I don't know much about Chicago but I can say one thing...their subway system isn't as great and huge; graffiti was the art that defined New York City in so many ways...NYC was known for that...maybe there are/were more gangs in Chicago but NYC was crazy back then...crazy enough for it to be the perfect setting for The Warriors


gee...I wonder what made this guy create this thread and run off...
Wow theSleepiLizzie_of_2006, I like New York and to me it's/it was perfect 4 the movie too!!! :mrgreen:
But yours it's not an answer, it's a piece of poetry in N.Y.'s honour!!!  :D
Congralutations, what an answer!!! If he still is on, what could that guy answer you!?! 8)
[color=#FF0000][align=center]Wanna Fight? Make Your Move![/align][/color]
[align=center][img]http://digilander.libero.it/ran.s/HoustonTheSwanLogo.jpg[/img][/align]
[color=#FF0000][align=center]"That's cause u guys r so bad they're afraid of u!!!"[/align][/color]

User avatar
theSleepiLizzie_of_2006
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 379
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 2:23 pm
Location: Queens, NY
Contact:

Re: the warriors movie would have been better in chicago?

Post by theSleepiLizzie_of_2006 »

TheSwan I hope your not being sarcastic  :?

If that guy was still on I'm sure he would probably curse at me in a chicago kind of way...or have nothing to say because whether its the "poetry" or everybody else's comments it made him keep quiet since nobody has  really agreed with him...however it wasn't meant to scare anybody and make them hide in a ditch somewhere  :p

And the answer may not have been the best of answers but it tells the truth of how New York is a better setting for the movie
[img]http://i139.photobucket.com/albums/q302/SleepiTsu27/Untitled2.jpg[/img]
~this chic is packed...

Frank_Castle
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 292
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:25 pm

Re: the warriors movie would have been better in chicago?

Post by Frank_Castle »

I've never been to NYC myself but it's the one place I'd love to go to 2nd only to Detroit (because of the significance of the juggalo culture in Detroit) but I'm thinking of heading to NYC someday.
[url=http://userbarmaker.com/][img]http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/1702/541179847029lb8.png[/img][/url]

User avatar
The Swan
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 1919
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 10:14 pm
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: the warriors movie would have been better in chicago?

Post by The Swan »

theSleepiLizzie_of_2006 wrote: TheSwan I hope your not being sarcastic  :?

If that guy was still on I'm sure he would probably curse at me in a chicago kind of way...or have nothing to say because whether its the "poetry" or everybody else's comments it made him keep quiet since nobody has  really agreed with him...however it wasn't meant to scare anybody and make them hide in a ditch somewhere  :p

And the answer may not have been the best of answers but it tells the truth of how New York is a better setting for the movie
Well yesterday after posting, I was sure you'd have misurdestood me!!! :mrgreen:

So no sweat theSleepiLizzie_of_2006, I was 4 real!!!
I love New York, believe me!!! You simply was able to write all the best about NY and NY as best setting 4 the movie!!!
I'd have wanted to write the same!!! That's(and only that!!!) my yesterday post meaning!!!
About that guy I know you didn't want to scare him and anybody else!!! Me too!!!
So...  :) you're on candid camera!!! Just kidding!!! Bye  8)
[color=#FF0000][align=center]Wanna Fight? Make Your Move![/align][/color]
[align=center][img]http://digilander.libero.it/ran.s/HoustonTheSwanLogo.jpg[/img][/align]
[color=#FF0000][align=center]"That's cause u guys r so bad they're afraid of u!!!"[/align][/color]

Post Reply