
Lizzies are a lower rank than the Orphans???
-
- Rank: Destroyer
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 3:12 am
- Location: New York City
Lizzies are a lower rank than the Orphans???
I know there arent that many females here so i might not be backed up on this, but what the heck. Why is it that the Lizzies are considered a lower orphans. The Lizzies Did damage to the warriors and they where smart too, a helluva-lot more so than the orphans So why are they lower rank? 

Last edited by War Chief on Sat Feb 18, 2006 11:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Lizzies are a lower rank than the Orphans???
This too has made me wonder. Warchief you gotta explain to me how you could put the Orphans higher than the Lizzies? The Lizzies were way more established in the movie, they were on the network. They knew about the meeting, knew about what happened to Cyrus, they were on the lookout for the Warriors, and they were well armed. The Orphans just had a fire and dumb luck to have their encounter with the Warriors and even then they just had some chains and household knives. 

- KillerMime
- Rank: Warrior
- Posts: 339
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 10:28 pm
- Location: Atlanta
Re: Lizzies are a lower rank than the Orphans???
But the Lizzies weren't at the conclave, right? If they knew about it and were in the network, they should have been there. The Orphans were losers and idiots, but I think they'd show up to the party if someone invited them.
[img]http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g145/crypto17/ohs07.jpg[/img]
Re: Lizzies are a lower rank than the Orphans???
I think the Lizzies knew they couldn't stand a chance if they went to the conclave. I am sure the Riffs were not going to babysit them just to make them feel safe and not get picked on by the male gangs. There were a couple of Lizzies who looked tough, but even them couldn't stand a chance against all those men who would probably mistake them for straight girls and harrass them. Sure the Orphans weren't there, but in a rumble, who would win? Honestly? The Orphans.....so therefor the Orphans were above the Lizzies. That is just my thought.
[img]http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b232/METALTANK/squares.jpg[/img]
Re: Lizzies are a lower rank than the Orphans???
LIONS I oughta kick yer butt! 

- Rembrant01
- Rank: Destroyer
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 6:10 pm
Re: Lizzies are a lower rank than the Orphans???
i agree orphans suck so baddley please warchief you have got to change this!
Re: Lizzies are a lower rank than the Orphans???
Temper, temperHarley wrote: LIONS I oughta kick yer butt!![]()




[img]http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b232/METALTANK/squares.jpg[/img]
- SoldierHeavyMuscle
- Moderator
- Posts: 2143
- Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 11:02 pm
- Location: Chi-Town!!
- Contact:
Re: Lizzies are a lower rank than the Orphans???
YEAH!!!!Harley wrote: LIONS I oughta kick yer butt!![]()
you, you, you, MAN, you!!!!! LOLOLÂ

(oh great, now she's gonna be after me!!)Â

Tried to give the devil my soul...
She said i had nothing to bargain with...
She said i had nothing to bargain with...
Re: Lizzies are a lower rank than the Orphans???
i rather party with the Lizzies if i'm not a wanted man =P~
[img]http://www.joepal.com/img/ciww.jpg[/img]
-
- Rank: Electric Eliminator
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 10:43 pm
- Location: Canada
Re: Lizzies are a lower rank than the Orphans???
I was wondering that as well. The Lizzies seem like a much better gang than the Orphans, so it doesn't make much sense that they're lower. Even if they didn't kill any of the Warriors that doesn't mean that they're weak, or at least weaker than the Orphans.
[img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v77/Court07/Homestar.gif[/img]
-
- Soldier The Middle
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 4:17 pm
Re: Lizzies are a lower rank than the Orphans???
oh no, now the women warriors are gonna go on strike
:badgrin:
personally though i would say the lizzies should conquer the orphans, but why change it? it's only a small differance in rank, there's no point and it's a waste of time(sorry gals but the war cheifs a busy man
)

personally though i would say the lizzies should conquer the orphans, but why change it? it's only a small differance in rank, there's no point and it's a waste of time(sorry gals but the war cheifs a busy man

Re: Lizzies are a lower rank than the Orphans???
I've set up a poll which ends in a week, I shall make whatever changes are necessary depending on the result.
The one and only!
Re: Lizzies are a lower rank than the Orphans???
The Lizzies ranked higher since they knew about the Conclave and the lame Orphans were clueless about it.
[img]http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a15/Twitch98/greetings.jpg[/img]
-
- Rank: Warrior
- Posts: 538
- Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 12:43 am
- Location: New Jersey
Re: Lizzies are a lower rank than the Orphans???
In the movie i would defenty say that the Lizzes were better but its not that big of a deal. Just get over it and let the Orphans be higher on the rankings.
[img]http://img126.imageshack.us/img126/8646/warriorssigag8.png[/img]
"This is the Rolling Stones Rock and Roll Circus, and we've got sights and sounds and marvels to delight your eyes and ears!"
"This is the Rolling Stones Rock and Roll Circus, and we've got sights and sounds and marvels to delight your eyes and ears!"