oh no

gemz-is-a-freak · Post by **gemz-is-a-freak** » Fri Jan 27, 2006 11:56 am

Am gutted the character of Swan may not be in the "loosely based"
I thought he was a fab character!!!

War-Dog · Post by **War-Dog** » Fri Jan 27, 2006 7:49 pm

You're right,no one can replace the original Michael Beck as Swan,he's brilliant!

All Grown Up · Post by **All Grown Up** » Sat Jan 28, 2006 6:07 pm

swan was cool but what you need to do with a movie like this is make it remake that does not look like a remake so nobody gets to ticked off about it.

gemz-is-a-freak · Post by **gemz-is-a-freak** » Sun Jan 29, 2006 8:44 pm

you're right but if they make it too different then the true impact of the film will be lost.

zubi q · Post by **zubi q** » Sun Jan 29, 2006 9:20 pm

micheal beck is the best!

gemz-is-a-freak · Post by **gemz-is-a-freak** » Mon Jan 30, 2006 5:36 pm

Micheal Beck IS the best!!!!!

Twitch · Post by **Twitch** » Tue Jan 31, 2006 4:21 pm

Like the Warriors, Michael Beck is the BEST!

gemz-is-a-freak · Post by **gemz-is-a-freak** » Tue Jan 31, 2006 5:02 pm

it just won't be the same without him I'm afraid

Twitch · Post by **Twitch** » Wed Feb 01, 2006 4:57 pm

It figures they'll have a character that seems familiar like Swan but I think that's where the similarity will end. If they copy the theme of a guy taking over for a fallen warchief that will be the Sawn character but he won't be the same at all.

The Warriors Movie Site Forum

oh no

oh no

oh no

oh no

yeah

oh no

oh no

oh no

oh no

oh no