Would Masai do the same.

[nazzac]

Would have Masai tried to take over the city like cyrus?

[stevo2k6]

Would have Masai tried to take over the city like cyrus?

he didnt seem like the type of guy that would do that, inf act we dont really know mesai as a character one thing we do know is that he defo gets his revenge if owt goes wrong.

he came across as more tough than cyrus, although cyrus is "magic, whole lotta magic"

[Cowboy606]

honestly, he seemed to be the type of guy who would think more realisticly than cyrus, but we cant be sure cause there just wasn't enough of him given to us in the movie to make an accurate guess.

[stevo2k6]

honestly, he seemed to be the type of guy who would think more realisticly than cyrus, but we cant be sure cause there just wasn't enough of him given to us in the movie to make an accurate guess.

exactly

so we cant make a real decision about that

[Ajax7]

IMO i dont think that cyrus was just trying to take over the city... I thought he was trying to end the fighting by uniting all the gangs, having one huge fight with the police and then yeh they would have taken over the city..... but guess what.... no more fighting. And in answer to your question, No, masai was more realistic.

[Luther828]

Didn't I create this topic before? http://warriorsmovie.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=10711.0

Maybe that was different; no problem if you have.

And to answer your question I don't think he would have. Like Ajax7 said he was much more of a realistic and he just didn't have that thing that cyrus had.

[nazzac]

Didn't I create this topic before? http://warriorsmovie.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=10711.0

Maybe that was different; no problem if you have.

And to answer your question I don't think he would have. Like Ajax7 said he was much more of a realistic and he just didn't have that thing that cyrus had.

Mine means would Masai try to take over thr city, and run it. Yours is about the truce which means no fighting.

[Luther828]

Ok, no problem. I see the difference now

[The Swan]

Ok let's say indeed yours are different Topics, in Luther828's I answered Masai wouldn't have carried on the Truce, cause he was more of a realistic Man.
So Nazzac, about your Topic: I think Masai would not even have thought about a Great Meeting. Don't misunderstand me, he would have tried to run the City... but in a different way.

[stevo2k6]

Ok let's say indeed yours are different Topics, in Luther828's I answered Masai wouldn't have carried on the Truce, cause he was more of a realistic Man.
So Nazzac, about your Topic: I think Masai would not even have thought about a Great Meeting. Don't misunderstand me, he would have tried to run the City... but in a different way.

theswan has nailed it in the head once more well done

[The Swan]

Thanks a lot bro, anyway I've to say both really are Very Good Topics... so, it was just a Pleasure!!! 8)

[The Swan]

I don't think Masai would do any differently than what Cyrus would REALLY do. I think the truce was simply a ploy to bring every gang under the control of the Riffs. He was selling unity to everyone - but what they were really buying was a dictatorship.

They would have discovered this the first time they tried to do anything independently from Cyrus' authority.

This is anyway true, that night all the Gangs were under The Riffs. No problems, the Reason wasn't "Contestable". But sooner or later, even if to Rule the City wasn't "Contestable" too, we would have seen some "LITTLE" rebellion. 8)