Your least favourite Warrior.

irratebass · Post by **irratebass** » Sat Nov 19, 2005 6:50 pm

Twitch & Lazyjoker, you make some interesting points about Rembrant, I like the Mascot thing....have to agree there, I just didn't think he fit is all, and neither did Rock Star since they made his initiation the tutorial ha.

KillerMime · Post by **KillerMime** » Sat Nov 19, 2005 8:10 pm

I'd have to say Fox. The guy just seems out of place. I think it was just bad casting. The actor looks too old and like he belongs in a college library.

Punksleader · Post by **Punksleader** » Sun Nov 20, 2005 11:29 am

I must say Cowboy

vermin76 · Post by **vermin76** » Sun Nov 20, 2005 1:53 pm

after reading through all of your posts i notice the main victims of the least favourate warrior title seems to be between fox and rembrandt.now heres an alternate view for you all.when fox takes mercy down the stairs the cop ambushes fox and completely takes him by suprise giving the cop the upper hand all the way.even though fox got a shot in on the cop the cop had a big weight advantage.all the cop had to do basically was simply lay on the fox until fox ran himself out of energy then when that had happened just slip the cuffs on him.but the cop got desperate with fox as he couldnt get the overall stance to keep him down so he decided to play dirty and throw him towards the line which caused foxes death initialy by electricution.by the time he was mutilated he would have dead already from hitting the live rail.

cowboy
too many people remember that cowboy was taken down by the furie leader.i,ve said this before and i,ll say it again.he had been running for just about all the time he left the conclave so he was worn down,his stamina would have been i reserves.for those that critisize his size and height what the hell has that got to do with his fighting abilities.some of you have said it yourself,he proved that he could fight against the punks despite him being as small and puny as you say he is.cowboy was a warrior who proved his worth and his place within the gang.

rembrandt
yes he was the smallest of them all and yes he wasnt the greatist fighter out of them all.he was the tagger and if he was in trouble the rest of the gang were there to help him which would probably have been a prioroty for several members like the fox and swan to watch his back and generally keep an eye on his welfare.i do agree that when the punks gang up on swan he could have done more than just sit there and watch but at the same time he was watching over mercy as she followed swan to where the punks started taking lumps out of him.the point of him almost crying when the confussion set in at the conclave after cyrus had been shot,what do you want me to say?he was young he was obvously scared like swan stated before the train ride to the bronx "we aint even been to the bronx before".the poor kid was seperated from the rest of the gang members with what looked like a load of stampeding animals heading straight for him.and you critisize him for being scared

if he was truly useless how the hell did he save cochise and vermins lives by being cautious and not falling into the lizzies venus flytrap like vermin and cochise had already done?

i,ll just finish off with if rembrandt was totally useless like a lot of you claim then how come he made it all the way to the end of the film unlike ajax who yet again like vermin and cochise jumped into the trap.where vermin and cochise had the wise head of rembrandt to GET THEM OUT OF TROUBLE ajax didnt and wouldnt listen to anything swan,snow and COWBOY had to say to him he brought about his own downfall and didnt make the end of the movie.

personally i dont have any least fav warriors,they all did their duties even the ones who didnt make the end of the film.

WE ARE ALL WARRIORS FANS STOP LOOKING FOR REASONS TO PUT THEM DOWN!!!!!

Jigglyvicky · Post by **Jigglyvicky** » Mon Nov 21, 2005 3:33 am

Thats a hard question. Each one is unique in his own right. But i'm gonna plump for Rembrandt. I just feel he didn't have that fighting visciousness that was needed to be a warrior. Also, not in any way being mean, but do you get the impression that he's gay??

vermin76 · Post by **vermin76** » Mon Nov 21, 2005 11:25 am

Jigglyvicky wrote:Thats a hard question. Each one is unique in his own right. But i'm gonna plump for Rembrandt. I just feel he didn't have that fighting visciousness that was needed to be a warrior. Also, not in any way being mean, but do you get the impression that he's gay??

DONT EVEN GO THERE.THIS HAS BEEN BROUGHT UP BEFORE AND CAUSED A BIG MESS.DONT START IT OFF AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Frenchie · Post by **Frenchie** » Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:45 pm

if rembrandt is new then how comes he is a the big meeting?

CompanyScum · Post by **CompanyScum** » Mon Nov 21, 2005 8:02 pm

CompanyScum wrote:Rembrandt, he may have saved Cochise and Vermin.
But the fight against The Punks?
He could've at least helped out Swan.

He also, didn't tag that much.
Only once, and that was at a cemetary.

theSaracens · Post by **theSaracens** » Fri Nov 25, 2005 11:04 pm

Rembrandt is a weak and non-helpful warrior. he shouldn't have joined.

vermin76 · Post by **vermin76** » Sat Nov 26, 2005 5:46 pm

theSaracens wrote:Rembrandt is a weak and non-helpful warrior. he shouldn't have joined.

open your eyes and look again!!!!!

Renegade333 · Post by **Renegade333** » Sun Nov 27, 2005 11:06 pm

id have to say vermin cause he complained alot

Love me! LOVE DOPEFISH! · Mon Nov 28, 2005 5:07 am

vermin76 wrote: i do agree that when the punks gang up on swan he could have done more than just sit there and watch but at the same time he was watching over mercy as she followed swan to where the punks started taking lumps out of him.

Don't forget his arm was cut open. Straight to the bone, probably. With a razor blade. That is not a small boo-boo. That is a very big boo-boo, and since it was at the base of the forearm/elbow, he's lucky that it didn't bleed him completely AND he could still use his arm.

and, yeah. When the traps were laid, he was logical and collected, if not necessarily calm. You gotta have brains, caution, and patience, not just brawn, or else you're gonna get japped really fast.

Cleon, Swan, Rembrandt, and the Fox were the best as far as the brains aspect goes.

vermin76 · Post by **vermin76** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 9:49 am

Renegade333 wrote:id have to say vermin cause he complained alot

correct he did complain a lot but he backed his complaining up with muscle when it was needed.

swan12 · Post by **swan12** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 9:30 pm

remembrandt is kinda cool he can fight ok good wit paint!!!
Cleon kicks but
the fox has good sight
vermin is the ladys man
ajaxs gets pissed of alot
swan makes a good leader
cochise i guees is a good fighter
cowboy is ok at fightin
snow is a good fighter

swan12 · Post by **swan12** » Thu Dec 01, 2005 12:06 am

really in the punks he couldve just helped swan out! but remembrandt is cool and all but hes the tagger soo taggers i think dont have 2 be the best fighter

The Warriors Movie Site Forum