Page 1 of 1

if it was warriors against riffs who would win in an all out

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 5:18 pm
by the renegade
the warriors because they can fight

Re: if it was warriors against riffs who would win in an all

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 7:11 pm
by papa arnold
the riffs...well why dont you be logical not just say the warriors becuase their the main thing in the fill i think the riffs cos they wouldnt have made it to the biggest gang in the city if they wernt and plus they know martial arts

Re: if it was warriors against riffs who would win in an all

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 7:22 pm
by The Fox
Stop topics like this please.

Re: if it was warriors against riffs who would win in an all

Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 9:46 pm
by bryanampowell
the warriors

Re: if it was warriors against riffs who would win in an all

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 3:36 am
by Baby Bear
It would probably be the riffs. The warriors are kinda weak now since they lost ajax, fox and cleon. But the only people that I believe will fair out better in this fight would be Snow, maybe Swan. The others would get wrecked. It also pretty much depends how much people they have with them.

Possibility of winning in my opinio:
Riffs 7/10

Warriors 4/10

Re: if it was warriors against riffs who would win in an all

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:36 am
by Cleon-HR
The Warriors will win, cause they are home now, and they count something like 70 members? Am i right? So they gonna kick their ass :D

Re: if it was warriors against riffs who would win in an all

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 9:42 pm
by The Fox
The Fox wrote: Stop topics like this please.
  Can nobody see what i said :?

Re: if it was warriors against riffs who would win in an all

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 9:42 pm
by The Fox
Copperhead wrote: It would probably be the riffs. The warriors are kinda weak now since they lost ajax, fox and cleon. But the only people that I believe will fair out better in this fight would be Snow, maybe Swan. The others would get wrecked. It also pretty much depends how much people they have with them.

Possibility of winning in my opinio:
Riffs 7/10

Warriors 4/10
That is 11/10 then?

Re: if it was warriors against riffs who would win in an all

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:35 pm
by stevo2k6
The Fox wrote:
The Fox wrote: Stop topics like this please.
  Can nobody see what i said :?
i agree too much junk like this on the forums its pointless and has been discussed too much

Re: if it was warriors against riffs who would win in an all

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 10:19 am
by Swan 1979
Yeah its gettig really annoying. :doubt:

Re: if it was warriors against riffs who would win in an all

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 1:00 pm
by SoldierHeavyMuscle
sorry, guys...
ive been incapacitated! ;)

ok, now what is this mickey-mouse crap??
ya hear the Fox??? :roll:
the next person to post in this thread...
gets a vacation, from the forum! ;)

yeah, im back! :twisted:

Re: if it was warriors against riffs who would win in an all

Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:49 pm
by horrorsmetalwarrior
The Riffs In The Movie B/C They Outnumber The Warriors By Alot.

The Warriors In The Game B/C They Can Have Equal Numbers Fighting The Riffs.