The Warriors Movie Site Forum

The game shows that the Warriors r litterally the best of the best, if you look back on the movie (yes I know it's an old movie) the warriors don't look that tough, they still kick. but At least they could have found stronger looking people for the part.

Who cares, the real actors would have to be on steroids to look somewhat like the video game characters my friend. Its not just brute strength the Warriors showed, ya dig?

And there is the difference between real people and Video games but then again I don't agree with your statement about the game characters being really buff. If you look closely they look their normal size and the only reason they can kick so much is because you're controlling them!

i dont think they should be compared, the game is the game and was created for entertainment like any other beat em up games, ITS JUST A GAME !!! dont cross the game with the movie

KissTheRain wrote: And there is the difference between real people and Video games but then again I don't agree with your statement about the game characters being really buff. If you look closely they look their normal size and the only reason they can kick so much is because you're controlling them!

Oh yeah Kiss, your answer is too funny... "cause u're controlling them!!!"---> TRUE!!!... and above all it's a good one!!!
I'd have answered just the same!!!
Anyway the Movie is the Movie... and the Game is just another Thing "Warriors4ever"!!! 8)

I bought the movie first, and I loved it, i thought it felt a bit short though. The movie really mad me appreciate all of the story that the game had to offer.

badjab wrote: I bought the movie first, and I loved it, i thought it felt a bit short though. The movie really mad me appreciate all of the story that the game had to offer.

but u agree that the game is just a game

They look average, if you wanna see bulky people then watch 300.

Lion wrote: They look average, if you wanna see bulky people then watch 300.

lol, I agree with Lions about the Warriors in the game looking of average size, I think the only reason they seem to have ungodly strength is because 1) its a game, I mean you really wouldn't get very far in the game if your character had to rest after a huge fight because those happen every 7 minutes and 2) most people know video games aren't reality 3) Why are you letting a videogame influence your decision to try new things? Should you be making that decision yourself?

comparing the real actors who played the parts of the warriors to the images portrayed in the game is madness.cgi stuff shall always be portrayed as more muscular than any real person apart from if you modelled a character exactly the same as a real person in every detail.

stevo2k6 wrote:

badjab wrote: I bought the movie first, and I loved it, i thought it felt a bit short though. The movie really mad me appreciate all of the story that the game had to offer.

but u agree that the game is just a game

yes but, i believe the game is a fairly accurate part of the storyline shown in the movie.

Yeah, this can be true, but to me the point it's not the game is fairly accurate... etc...
Don't forget they made the game 26 years later and, 4 istance, Walter Hill was not a "Game Creators Staff" member... so after all, if you (or someone else) find some physique change... I mean it's the game, not the movie.
Our "CORE" is the Movie. 8)

for me the movie will always rule over the game.the game was accurate with the film to certain degrees but never fully followed the movie storyline.

vernin is right, i cudnt have put the answer a better way

When I play a game based on a movie, I prefer it if there is some deviations from the film.  A game can add plot twists without detracting from the original movie.  If a game follows the movie exactly, I feel you can lose some of the excitement because players know exactly what is coming next.