The Warriors Movie Site Forum

i know that you probably dont have one but who do u think is the most anoying.

for me its mercy

cyrus the hun wrote:i know that you probably dont have one but who do u think is the most anoying.

for me its mercy

hah i agree

i could have gone the whole movie without any mercy going on

Swan was very annoyed w/ Mercy!

i could have watched it with no mercy aswell

does anyone find her attractive

Two words that should never go together are Mercy and attractive.. Unless it's Mercy is not attractive. Or something to that effect. I however could have also gone through the movie without Mercy. I found she did nothing for the film.

If the film went like the original script ( The Fox with Mercy) I would've respected Swan alot more. Him getting the girl took out that "Leader" feeling I was looking for.

Yes, but you are overlooking the fact that if he HADN'T have been leader, he and she never would have been close enough to worry about.

She barely gave a look to anyone else except the Fox and Swan.

And no one else ever disputed the right of them to appoint themselves as looking out for her.
Swan wouldn't have given her the time of day IF Fox wouldn't have gotten knocked off----cause he really didn't want her until he couldn't get rid of her.
Even then he was more than willing for her to be gone and save herself--it was her choice not to go---no his.
So I think he displayed as much leadership ability as anyone could have.

The Fox was annoying. I mean really, white skin + afro =


He reminds me of Screech from saved by the bell.

SkateXer99 wrote:The Fox was annoying. I mean really, white skin + afro =


He reminds me of Screech from saved by the bell.

That is way too harsh at least he doesn't sound like him

I found Ajax the most annoying myself. Does the tough image too much

Faggot, wimps, faggots, wimp..... Does my head in!

The Fox wrote:I found Ajax the most annoying myself. Does the tough image too much

Faggot, wimps, faggots, wimp..... Does my head in!

BLASPHEMY! lol

I found Rembrandt a complete waste of time, he cant fight, he's a wimp and his graffiti sucks

Hi i like all the Warriors and think it's sad that only 6 make it back

Just at times Ajax get's on my nerves.

I think Mercy adds to the film rather then takes anything away from it.

i think eveyone does ther part in making the movie good but some people were less of an aset to the movies then others. i personally didnt like mercy or rambramdt but thought they id ddo there roles nicely

SkateXer99 wrote:The Fox was annoying. I mean really, white skin + afro =


He reminds me of Screech from saved by the bell.

Well if your hair is naturally right for it, white and afro go together.
My son has naturally curly hair, and when he lets it go and grow, and picks it out--it has been 5 inches long, and standing up and out---he has a perfect one!!!
the times it doesn't really go is when they have to perm them that way.
So I don't know exactly if hair alone would make Fox annoying, but that is my own thought.

When I was a kid, I thought that Deborah Van Valkenburgh was really foxy on Too Close For Comfort, so I've always had a soft spot for her in the Warriors.

I agree that Rembrandt is pretty annoying. "Hey wait for me!"

lycanthropic wrote:Two words that should never go together are Mercy and attractive.. Unless it's Mercy is not attractive.

I like Mercy but then again, as my brother always tells me, I have a thing for grunge slappers.

The never really understood why Rembrandt was choosen to go to the conclave. What was his role beside spray painting W's. It's not like he would be an asset in difficult situations especially as he couldn't punch his way out of a paper bag. I might have understood if he was being groomed as a potential leader of the future and taken along for the experience but he wasn't the most confident young man and diffferently not a future leader.

So what was his role?