which is.......

Da Warrior · Post by **Da Warrior** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 10:28 pm

Which is the smallest gang in the warriors

Cowboy79 · Post by **Cowboy79** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 11:49 pm

I don't know maybe someone else in the fourms will know.

Ranchgal · Post by **Ranchgal** » Tue Nov 29, 2005 3:21 am

This was sort of hashed out in an old thread---and by using Cyrus's numbers- we figured that the gangs at the conclave must have had at least 100 members to be invited--so if the only gang we see that is NOT invited, and low down the totem pole---then using those figures---The Orphans topping out at about 30 members would have to be the smallest gang in the movie.

da-warrior · Post by **da-warrior** » Tue Nov 29, 2005 5:36 am

well they say the orphans arent even on the network so its fair to say they would have some of the lowest numbers of any gang in the movie ,they dint even know about the meeting lol

Da Warrior · Post by **Da Warrior** » Tue Nov 29, 2005 6:23 pm

the orphans are the sorriest excuse of a gang I have ever seen every gang according to what you sed are bigger than the orphans and are probally the worst fighting gangs aswell and the poorest gang in the movie.
I believe that the orphans should not be in the movie but everyone else should. [-( [-( [-( [-(

Now the best gangs are the baseball furies and the warriors.

psychodog · Post by **psychodog** » Sun Dec 04, 2005 2:21 pm

in the film the fox says the orphans full strengh is about 30
so i would say the orphans are the smallest gangs 8)

Electriceliminator · Post by **Electriceliminator** » Fri Dec 09, 2005 7:03 pm

Orphans suck razor blade or petrol bomb huummmmm? tricky

lutherschk · Post by **lutherschk** » Thu Dec 22, 2005 5:11 pm

I agree... the orphans!!

The Warriors Movie Site Forum

which is.......

which is.......

which is.......

which is.......

which is.......

kk

which is.......

which is.......

which is.......