Page 1 of 3

the warriors 2

Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 9:42 pm
by Truro Warrior
the new warriors could lead to a warriors 2 then 3 im mean the 1979 could of had a second

Re: the warriors 2

Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 10:49 pm
by Swan 1979
What all most everyone on this forum hates the idea of the warriors remake.

Re: the warriors 2

Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 4:54 am
by Baby Bear
Truro Warrior wrote: the new warriors could lead to a warriors 2 then 3 im mean the 1979 could of had a second
We will have to wait and see. I think Warriors 3 would be outta the question. I hope they don't make a warriors 3.

Re: the warriors 2

Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 10:57 am
by PowerPaulie
I hope they won't make it either...I'm pretty curious about Warriors 2...but I don't think it will be any good...

Re: the warriors 2

Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 9:06 am
by stevo2k7
they may make a suquel but i doubt it, its jus a one film story a sequel wpuld probably be daft although id be curious

Re: the warriors 2

Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 4:05 pm
by redryder606
i would defintley go see a warriors 2 but 3 out of the question

Re: the warriors 2

Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 6:48 pm
by Heavy_Swan
I think is not a very bad idea to make a remake about The Warriors, but we all are regard to we old Warriors, so I'll see the remake in case the filmmaker does it, just for my individual curiosity.

Re: the warriors 2

Posted: Sat May 26, 2007 10:38 am
by swan-warchief
the warriors 2 will nver beat the first
and this is a very bad idea but im goin to watch it wen it comes out to see if its betta which will hve no doubt tht it ont be betta

Re: the warriors 2

Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 5:43 pm
by xcowboyxrembrandtx
I think it would be a good idea to make a second.Just too bad they didnt have this idea after making the first film.They could've showed what happened to Ajax after being arrested,and they could've shown other Warriors, since there was alot more than nine.

Re: the warriors 2

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:13 am
by stevo2k6
Id defo be curious about a sequel, but i agree should have been done id say a few years after the original, but its a cult classic and thats the main thing

Re: the warriors 2

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:31 pm
by HIGH HAT
i alway though if your gonna do a re-make..why not set it in the 50s or 60s..
a kind of prequel. this gives the Warriors some history..and would make sense to lead up to the Warriors of 1979.
but a remake for todays standards??..no way..theres nomore fist fights in gangs..its all guns and warfare.
for a true street gang feature nothing like a real fight to prove the stronger gang..back when gangs were gangs!!

i say yes to a remake..only if its a prequel to the classic 1979 (like the Sol Yurick book.which takes place in the early 60s i think)...wheres Walter Hill dammit!  ;)

Re: the warriors 2

Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 11:25 am
by stevo2k6
remake is a remake of the movie a prequel is a totally differ movie, i see where ya coming from though, maybe a prequel would work, maybe it wont, hope the remake is good, either way im gona see it (ive said that in about 10 other threads)

Re: the warriors 2

Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:41 pm
by New Jersey Warrior
man, i think the movie's gonna suk :cry: :cry: :( :evil:. it's deffinently not gonna beat the original. ( i'm gonna see it though.)

Re: the warriors 2

Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 5:07 pm
by stevo2k6
i aint even gona say that im gona watch coz ive said whether i am or not in 15 other threads:P, im lookin forward to it though

Re: the warriors 2

Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 4:16 pm
by Warriorfan54321
thee's just one thing this director doesn't realise a remake of the roiginal and then making it nothing like the original with just some simularities(it has a gang named the warriors and a cyrus)  is just plain stupid make another version of it by all means but don't deface it so noone remembers the original.