Page 1 of 2

where the gangs right

Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 5:48 pm
by kingcleon
do you think they picked the right gangs for the movie because i dont think the lizzies bit was very interesting i would have put the moonrunners in the movie instead

Re: where the gangs wright

Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 7:49 pm
by stevo2k6
learn to spell mate lol. but i see what you mean but it was interesting because a female gang used their female charm to lure the warriors in.

Re: where the gangs right

Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 9:54 pm
by Hector
I reckon the gangs are fine as they are, but hey.... that's just my opinion...feel free to express yours.

Re: where the gangs right

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 2:34 am
by Baby Bear
Well it would be good to see the moonrunners but like Hector said it is good the way it is. Maybe the Moonrunners would give the warriors a run for their money just like the Punks.

Re: where the gangs right

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 4:29 am
by theSleepiLizzie_of_2006
And as what Hector and baby bear have mentioned...it would have been sort of boring just to have male gangs chasing and confronting the Warriors...the Lizzies were the only ones who could seduce them...even though I didn't think that scene should be changed...maybe kingcleon thinks something else should have been changed with that scene but to keep the Lizzies in it...any other ideas about that scene?

:|

Re: where the gangs right

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 9:31 am
by stevo2k6
theSleepiLizzie_of_2006 wrote: And as what Hector and baby bear have mentioned...it would have been sort of boring just to have male gangs chasing and confronting the Warriors...the Lizzies were the only ones who could seduce them...even though I didn't think that scene should be changed...maybe kingcleon thinks something else should have been changed with that scene but to keep the Lizzies in it...any other ideas about that scene?

:|
maybe the lizzies could have set them up with a male gang to get them ?

Re: where the gangs right

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 11:25 am
by Gezza
stevo2k6 wrote:
theSleepiLizzie_of_2006 wrote: And as what Hector and baby bear have mentioned...it would have been sort of boring just to have male gangs chasing and confronting the Warriors...the Lizzies were the only ones who could seduce them...even though I didn't think that scene should be changed...maybe kingcleon thinks something else should have been changed with that scene but to keep the Lizzies in it...any other ideas about that scene?

:|
maybe the lizzies could have set them up with a male gang to get them ?
I kinda thought they were when i think it was cochise who said wheres the guys and they said they're having the night out that there were guys up in that room place and were gona jab em. (that was when i first saw the movie)

Re: where the gangs right

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 2:52 pm
by kingcleon
im not gay or anything im just saying i think the film slows down a bit when they meet the lizzies it would be cool if the lizzies lured the warriors to the moonrunners hangout or somthing like that

Re: where the gangs right

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 3:05 pm
by stevo2k6
kingcleon wrote: im not gay or anything im just saying i think the film slows down a bit when they meet the lizzies it would be cool if the lizzies lured the warriors to the moonrunners hangout or somthing like that
isnt that what i said kinda in a way ?lol

Re: where the gangs right

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 3:10 pm
by kingcleon
sorry, i just thnk the moonrunners should be in the film tht would be cool

Re: where the gangs right

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:03 pm
by Lion
Well I personally like the change of pace.  However as I have mentioned before, a couple more gangs added to the film would of been better imo.  Which ones?  Electric Eliminators and Panzers.

Re: where the gangs right

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 9:11 pm
by adam88
Well personally I like the pace the way it is.  The reason I say this is because if gangs constantly came out of every direction to get the warriors, then it would start to get ridiculous, and unrealistic.  I mean some people like to pretend that Snow and Cowboy, got into a rumble off-screen with other gangs.  Sometimes on ones journey, challenges and obstacle come in all symbolic forms, such as the "temptation of a woman", and I think Walter Hill explains it so well. 

Re: where the gangs right

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 10:38 am
by stevo2k6
kingcleon wrote: sorry, i just thnk the moonrunners should be in the film tht would be cool

calm down youve said lol, would have been cool if the turnbulls drove to the lizzies place and lizzies setr the warriors up and they have a bit of a brawl, because the turnbulls knew they got on the train and they could have been the ones that "set that god dam fire" to slow them down

Re: where the gangs right

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 1:29 pm
by eliminator1
Personally, I'd have replaced the Punks with another gang, or at least have done more to make them stand out. The fight scene between them and the Warriors was a good one, but compared to most of the other gangs in the movie, the Punks don't really stand out and are a bit "blah".

I think the Lizzies were one of the cooler gangs in the movie, although they should have been more threatening. In the original script, they manage to kill Vermin. If not kill him, they could have caught him, and handed him over to the Riffs, then have Vermin rejoin the Warriors at the end when the Riffs arrive to punish the Rogues.

Re: where the gangs right

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 2:48 pm
by kingcleon
it would be good if when the punks saw the warriors another gang saw them at the same time and there was a three way fight between the punks warriors and the moonrunners that would be cool