The Warriors Movie Site Forum

OKey
If Swan missed luther's arm with the knife and luther shot swan.
do you think that snow,vermin,cochise,rembrand,cowboy and maby mercy whold attack them(The rouges)?

I am sure they would try---however in my opinion---it would depend on how many bullets Luther had left---Snow, Cochise, Cowboy, Rembrant and Vermin would have been too smart to commit suicide---so IF they thought Luther had a full gun, they may just scatter.

but if there was any way to get Luther taken down--they would have, no question.

Whold them attack the rouges?
Yes, They shot the warriors's war cheif!
Naaah,Maby!
No, If the attack whold maby luther shot them too!

OKey
If Swan missed luther's arm with the knife and luther shot swan.
do you think that snow,vermin,cochise,rembrand,cowboy and maby mercy whold attack them(The rouges)?

HUH?????

(Puts on flame- retardent suit & ducks for cover)

Im lost in translation too Marlbor.

OK, i'm gonna join yins. what in the world did he just ask us??

Marlboroprojects wrote:

HUH?????

(Puts on flame- retardent suit & ducks for cover)

You don't understand?

I think that what you are trying to say is would the remaining Warriors still fight if Swan had been shot by Luther?

It would be a case of they would have to attack the Rogues as Luther would kill them even if they only got one Rogue that's better then standing around waiting to be shot!

I think maybe the swedish to English translation is not always as it is said in English. But, your English is 100% better the my Swedish.

jamiepikee (Fox) wrote:I think that what you are trying to say is would the remaining Warriors still fight if Swan had been shot by Luther?

It would be a case of they would have to attack the Rogues as Luther would kill them even if they only got one Rogue that's better then standing around waiting to be shot!

I think maybe the swedish to English translation is not always as it is said in English. But, your English is 100% better the my Swedish.

wow!!! jamie, you speak swedish??? lolololol alright!!! a translater!!! help is on the way, bort!!

would you attack someone who was holding a gun cuz i wouldnt and i dont think the warriors would either

But, if you're going to get shot anyway why wouldn't you?

[/quote]

jamiepikee (Fox) wrote:But, if you're going to get shot anyway why wouldn't you?

I'd rather run away from the bullets than straight into them

I am not so sure Luther was that good a shot---He hit Cyrus cause he was standing still and on a platform---But he missed Fox completely cause he ducked and dodged--so I would be IF the guys would have scattered and kept going--they all would have made it safe-I don't thing L could have hit them running on the sand.

Rouges are laime, you only have to worry about the other 5 possible bullets in the gun and there are more warriors left then that if you include mercy. Nah warriors would have decked them for sure

jamiepikee (Fox) wrote:I think that what you are trying to say is would the remaining Warriors still fight if Swan had been shot by Luther?

It would be a case of they would have to attack the Rogues as Luther would kill them even if they only got one Rogue that's better then standing around waiting to be shot!

I think maybe the swedish to English translation is not always as it is said in English. But, your English is 100% better the my Swedish.

Yeah. but i can wrot it agan and show how i mean.
If swan missed luthers arm here

And the riffs don't were there.

And luther shot swan.

Do you think that the rest of the warriors whold attack the rouges?

Do you understand me now?

yes, for sure!! they would have beaten the rogues to bloody messes!! 8)