The Warriors Movie Site Forum

Well actually i have had this thought in my mind for quiet a while now. Why did the warriors pick rembrandt to be their painter? Because in the scene of the graveyard ive notice the W he paints on the tombstone isnt special, or great in any way. I think any of the warriors could have taged a simlpe W like rembrandt did. So the question is... is he a good painter? Or maybe his simplicity in the tombstone was because they were all in a hurry. I would like to hear your thoughts. Btw i did search in all the ways i could.

In my opinion: 1) they didnt really have the time, cops all over.
                      2) Swan only said 'mark this spot'.

Well they need somebody to hit the spot.....But they were in a hurry so it's not like he could do his best burner in 5 seconds.....

It was just a quick W, didn't need to be special.. besides, he was probably also scared out of his mind and all after what happened.

yeah i agree if you had cops on your ass you probably wouldn't be able to do nay better than a simple W but its a shame you don't get to see him do any other tags it would have been cool to see what his art was really like.

he was definately scared and plus the others left him in a graveyard

how do you make a 'W' special anyways? 

it was a quick tag,it wasn't supposed to look fancy.What was he suppose to do, put up a W that took him 5 minutes,then out line it with differn't colours and they were just putting it up to show theve been there,not a huge burner.

they was in a hurry and they didnt want to get caught

I guess you guys have a point. He was probably in a hurry, and the other warriors left him behind. But the shape of the W wasnt  that great. Painters are supose to have good outlining, and good letter shaping, but like i said the W rembrandt did wasnt special at all. But i guess i am now convinced that he was in a hurry like the rest of them. I mean why would cleon pick him to be a tagger when they were a street family of 120. He must have been talented after all.

who is to say... no one will ever actually know... i would estimate he could've done better if he had time... but anyone could do better if they had time... we had to evidence to show he was a bad painter, but we also have no evidence to show he was a good one... the only thing is that he was the painter of the group... so he must have been not too bad at it