Page 1 of 1
Warriors against the truce?
Posted: Sat May 27, 2006 2:22 pm
by $now4Ever
Hey when Snow says" Were goin in their like everyone else nine guys no weapons" it seems like he's lying because in the orphans sean he has a molotive cocktail and theirs not suppose to be any weapons. Does anybody else notice this?
Re: Warriors against the truce?
Posted: Sat May 27, 2006 3:09 pm
by Cowboy79
It wasn't a weapon at first it was a bottle of Alcohol around his neck.
Re: Warriors against the truce?
Posted: Sat May 27, 2006 3:21 pm
by andy_man
Yeah, it was probalby for drinking later... Wait, hasn't this been brought before?
/
Re: Warriors against the truce?
Posted: Sat May 27, 2006 3:26 pm
by $now4Ever
Well that makes sense it just seemed a little weird to me at first.
Re: Warriors against the truce?
Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 2:34 am
by CAZ
dude, this has been covered like 15 times! please use search
Re: Warriors against the truce?
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 7:43 pm
by SNOW 1
yea but the riffs would of taken the bottle of him before entering the park to the big meeting
Re: Warriors against the truce?
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 7:48 pm
by andy_man
snow1 wrote:
yea but the riffs would of taken the bottle of him before entering the park to the big meeting
But the Riffs were in the middle of the conclave, they didn't search everyone before they got in. And if they did search people it would be only at the start when not lots of gangs were there because it would be more in control. By the time the Warriors got there there was 1000 people there, therefore it would be next to impossible to search them. :doubt: