Page 1 of 3
					
				a better ending
				Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:02 pm
				by swan_jax
				the part when the warriors meet the rouges in coney sucks because that was 1 of the worst endings ever! they should of had a big fight the warriors vs the rouges. 

 and then when its close to the end of the fight luther pulls out his gun and swan pulls out his knife and thats when swab throws the knife. the game had a better ending then the movie did! 
 
 
 :doubt:.
 
			
					
				Re: a better ending
				Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:06 pm
				by Lion
				Though I still like the ending, a little fightin' action between Rogues and Warriors wouldn't hurt.
			 
			
					
				Re: a better ending
				Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:06 pm
				by MiddleMan07
				What??! Bad Ending, Warriors?? Ahhh, let me get my senses back.
 Nothing about the Warriors is bad in my mind, ok? That was a great ending, it wasnt supposed to be action-packed or anything like that. In my mind, I think that Luther crying made the whole film worth-while. And please.. please dont talk about the game in the movie forum. There is a seperate forum for that.
			 
			
					
				Re: a better ending
				Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 3:32 pm
				by andy_man
				Luther wouldn't want to fight, he's a wimp. He would just do it the easy way so HE wouldn't get in the line of fire or get hurt.
			 
			
					
				Re: a better ending
				Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 6:47 pm
				by prozium
				Though I love the movie as it is, I kind of would ahve preffered a fight between the warriors aned the rogues first.
			 
			
					
				Re: a better ending
				Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 7:30 pm
				by Ajax_41
				swan_jax wrote:
the part when the warriors meet the rouges in coney sucks because that was 1 of the worst endings ever! they should of had a big fight the warriors vs the rouges. 

 and then when its close to the end of the fight luther pulls out his gun and swan pulls out his knife and thats when swab throws the knife. the game had a better ending then the movie did! 
 
 
 :doubt:.
 
Swab!! 

  :badgrin:  

 :badgrin: yeah,a fight would be fun,but why would luther fight when he carries a gun?he knew he wuz gonna get wrecked
 
			
					
				Re: a better ending
				Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 8:15 pm
				by Mercy
				Personaly, I don't think that a fight between the Rogues and The Warriors would be any good. I don't think it would last very long and a fight on day light would just suck.
			 
			
					
				Re: a better ending
				Posted: Mon Apr 10, 2006 11:47 pm
				by The Wonder Wheel
				yh and i noticed tha ending was crap and the film was too short, they should of had it as long as lord of the rings lol  

 
			
					
				Re: a better ending
				Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 4:50 pm
				by vermin76
				The Wonder Wheel wrote:
yh and i noticed tha ending was crap and the film was too short, they should of had it as long as lord of the rings lol  
 
 
yeah i totally agree.......................NOT
make the warriors as long as the lord of the rings and youde completely lose the plot of the film and be hard up thinking of something relative to space the films parts out.
 
			
					
				Re: a better ending
				Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 5:44 pm
				by Journey
				Im glad that it ended the way it did, it was quite satisfying to go away and think about what the Riffs would do to the rogues (imagine the possibilities). On a different note if the Warriors had fought whats to say the Rogues wouldnt have beaten them or at least killed a couple of the warriors i mean would u be happier then
			 
			
					
				Re: a better ending
				Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 8:52 pm
				by Grits
				The ending was brilliant.  Once Swan had disabled Luther's gun hand, their last bet was called.  The Riffs allowing the Warriors "passage" off the beach and mopping up the Rogues for them completed their transition from outlaws to venerated boppers who would now garner the respect of the entire city.
			 
			
					
				Re: a better ending
				Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 9:19 pm
				by THC
				The ending was very good, but it did seem kind of rushed. The riff's just showing up seemed a little unbelievable to me, especially the first time I saw it. I was completely primed on watching swan give luther the good ol' one two.
			 
			
					
				Re: a better ending
				Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 11:14 pm
				by emissary
				These alternate creations are fine to me, but as a fan-fiction type idea.  To say it would be "better" isn't  fair I think.  So, I was thinking that everything is the same and then, after the Rogues are quickly slaughtered, an army of cops storm the beach and take out the Riffs.  Not that I don't like the Riffs, but this would close out the failure of Cyrus.  The "man" is tough to beat.
			 
			
					
				Re: a better ending
				Posted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 2:37 am
				by Cowboy79
				swan_jax you should be slapped for making a topic like this. I mean if your a fan of this film you don't criticze it on a fan site of the movie!
			 
			
					
				Re: a better ending
				Posted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 10:52 pm
				by emissary
				I think it was done in bad taste.  It's one thing to ask people to create a possible alternate that flows with the film.  But this thread started with an attack on the movie we know.