Page 1 of 2

Was it...

Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 4:29 am
by Zen444
Because the Punks drank and smoked some pot that they lost during the fight?

Re: Was it...

Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 12:22 pm
by Manson-Cryptorchild
This topic is pretty senceless...first of all - why does it matter, and who really cares? And second of all - how is anyone supposed to know if that was the case, because the movie doesn't give anything that says that...?

Re: Was it...

Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 12:40 pm
by All Grown Up
x.06X.Sarah.x wrote: This topic is pretty senceless...first of all - why does it matter, and who really cares? And second of all - how is anyone supposed to know if that was the case, because the movie doesn't give anything that says that...?
for real, this is one of the stupidest posts i have ever read! :evil:

Re: Was it...

Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 2:32 pm
by MiddleMan07
Looks whos talking  :doubt:

Re: Was it...

Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 5:43 pm
by Zen444
x.06X.Sarah.x wrote: how is anyone supposed to know if that was the case, because the movie doesn't give anything that says that...?
It's a discussion faggot. And if you payed attention to the movie, you would have seen the Punks drinking during the "Nowhere to Run" scene.

Re: Was it...

Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 5:52 pm
by Cowboy79
It's a discussion faggot. And if you payed attention to the movie, you would have seen the Punks drinking during the "Nowhere to Run" scene.
DID YOU JUST CALL THIS LADY A FAGGOT! Your the faggot tough guy no one cares if the Punks drank or smoked it that wouldn't effect their fighting ability! You should apoligize because I swear to god the people on the forum will make your life a living Hell! JACKASS

Re: Was it...

Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 6:09 pm
by MiddleMan07
Zen444 wrote:
x.06X.Sarah.x wrote: how is anyone supposed to know if that was the case, because the movie doesn't give anything that says that...?
It's a discussion faggot. And if you payed attention to the movie, you would have seen the Punks drinking during the "Nowhere to Run" scene.
Dude how can a girl be a faggot?? Plus just a warning, you are gonna get flamed till the cows come home, just a reminder.

Re: Was it...

Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 7:32 pm
by Johan
zen444 & x.06X.Sarah.x ,
Make your moves...

Re: Was it...

Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 9:27 pm
by Rembrant21
Cowboy79 wrote:
It's a discussion faggot. And if you payed attention to the movie, you would have seen the Punks drinking during the "Nowhere to Run" scene.
DID YOU JUST CALL THIS LADY A FAGGOT! Your the faggot tough guy no one cares if the Punks drank or smoked it that wouldn't effect their fighting ability! You should apoligize because I swear to god the people on the forum will make your life a living Hell! JACKASS
GO COWBOY I SWARE TO GOD IF U CALL HER THAT AGIN IL HUNT U DOWN!!

Re: Was it...

Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 9:52 pm
by paperdollorphan
I doubt that the Punks were the only gang that was intoxicated that night. My guess is many of the gangs indulged in drinking and things harder than pot. So I'm not sure it would be a handicap.
As for all this drama about callin girls names, i just think it'd be as lame if not worse if Sarah was a boy.

Re: Was it...

Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:18 pm
by Furies4life
Wow these arguments are pointless. First of all if you gonna know somebody drunk they tal kdiffrent and act diffrent. Also your life is going to be hell just like my man Cowboy said. Lock it up somebody!1

Re: Was it...

Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:31 pm
by Manson-Cryptorchild
Yes, indeed these arguments are pointless. And I didn't notice The Punks drinking during the "Nowhere to Run" scene. So, that doesn't mean you just go ahead and call me "faggot"...yeah, I have to say that I didn't say a nice thing about your topic. As much as I don't consider it a huge deal that you called me "faggot", because it's understandable, but I don't think it was right of you to be so ignorant, and to go as far as to calling me that. But, as I said, it's not a huge deal.

Re: Was it...

Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 11:57 pm
by Warloard18
ok, hold on it was a good question in a point of view, they were drinking and even if they wernt there must have been some thing up with them because if there on the riffs network they must be pretty tough and to get wrecked like that there not wimps like thefuries who hide behind a wooden bat and a paint kit form the market. i think that the punks should have easily taken the warriors considering they had probably 9 guys all packed and the warriors only 6 and 1 with a bat.

Re: Was it...

Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 12:02 am
by Furies4life
pretty tough and to get wrecked like that there not wimps like thefuries who hide behind a wooden bat and a paint kit form the market. i think that the punks should have easily taken the warriors considering they had probably 9 guys all packed and the warriors only 6 and 1 with a bat.
Wow wait a second who are you calling wimps. I hope you didn't just say the furies. See ehat i see in the furies scene is that Ajax and the leader where going to go in it one on one. However the Furies are not wimps. :evil:

Re: Was it...

Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 12:03 am
by emissary
Well I'll tell you, if the Warriors were smokers, there is no way they get away from the Turnbulls.  Forget the Furies.  Maybe it's because I never got to see the Turnbulls fight, but, they looked like some desperate dudes. Â