Page 1 of 1
The Warriors Ultimate Director's cut region 1 vs region 2
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 2:06 am
by Warrior Ajax
Which is better?
The Warriors Ultimate Director's cut region 1 vs region 2
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 3:56 am
by JoePal
maybe they are the carbon-copies of each other... well, except for the DVD packaging.
The Warriors Ultimate Director's cut region 1 vs region 2
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 4:42 am
by Warrior Ajax
doesn't the region 2 have better special features?
The Warriors Ultimate Director's cut region 1 vs region 2
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 5:14 am
by JoePal
no.. they're practically the same thing as the Region 1.
but that's my opinion - i believe myself 100% that it is the same DVD what we have here.
The Warriors Ultimate Director's cut region 1 vs region 2
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 11:44 am
by Putrid Moldyman
A few sources have confirmed that they're identical aside from the packaging, and it would also be a real kick in the teeth after Walter Hill's including an introduction to specifically discuss how he doesn't believe in Special Editions and commentary in the Region 1 version, only to have him turn around and provide just that for the Region 2 version.
The Warriors Ultimate Director's cut region 1 vs region 2
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 1:17 pm
by War Chief
I have a region 2 copy in the post and should be with me tomorrow or Thursday so I'll let you know. I'm not sure if it'll come in a case though. It's coming from Paramount's publishers so I can clear up what's on it for everyone before the release in the UK on the 17th.
The Warriors Ultimate Director's cut region 1 vs region 2
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2005 6:44 pm
by Dave Mack
The region 2 will be a PAL disc. PAL is the european TV standard. They have approximately 100 more lines of vertical picture information than our standard, NTSC. Often a PAL disc will look better. (The Lord of The Rings dvds for instance look much better.) The tradeoff is that PAL discs of films run 4% faster, (PAl speedup because film is shot at 24fps and PAL runs at 25.) so the pitch of the audio (unless digitally corrected like the Lord of the Rings discs were) is higher.
I have compared many PAL and NTSC DVDs and without question...
If the two DVDs are derived from the same transfer, PAL will ALWAYS be better. You can't cheat resolution.
I SEE WHY THEY CALL U MACK..
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2005 11:49 pm
by MESTIZO69
Dave Mack wrote:The region 2 will be a PAL disc. PAL is the european TV standard. They have approximately 100 more lines of vertical picture information than our standard, NTSC. Often a PAL disc will look better. (The Lord of The Rings dvds for instance look much better.) The tradeoff is that PAL discs of films run 4% faster, (PAl speedup because film is shot at 24fps and PAL runs at 25.) so the pitch of the audio (unless digitally corrected like the Lord of the Rings discs were) is higher.
I have compared many PAL and NTSC DVDs and without question...
If the two DVDs are derived from the same transfer, PAL will ALWAYS be better. You can't cheat resolution.
Dave, I see why they call you Mack..You are so on the money..I still have some old PAL VHS tapes of one of my old bands live in Amsterdam from 1989 that i need to convert to DVD..LOL..Take it easy, M69
The Warriors Ultimate Director's cut region 1 vs region 2
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 1:35 am
by Warrior Ajax
hey mestizo where did you get that font?
The Warriors Ultimate Director's cut region 1 vs region 2
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 6:13 pm
by MESTIZO69
Warrior Ajax wrote:hey mestizo where did you get that font?
I had it custom designed for me by my graphic designer..All the letters with exception of the z and 69 are derived from the original logo..Can u dig it? M69
