What if another gang was blamed by the Rogues????

Leave your comments and messages about the 1979 cult movie.
Post Reply
saner
Rank: Hurricane
Posts: 143
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 3:32 pm

What if another gang was blamed by the Rogues????

Post by saner »

what if Luther didnt say the Warriors did it?

what if he said:

A. "The Turnbulls A.C.s did it!"

B, "The Orphans did it!"

C. "The Lizzies did it!"

D. "The Baseball Furies did it!"

E. "The Punks did it!"

F. "The Rogues did it!" ;)

/ for fun, please share your opinion about the chances each gang might make it back to Coney Island (lets pretend their turf is Coney. and their turf in the movie becomes The Warriors' turf. :D

here what I think:

A. Um if they have that bus handy I think they might have the easier time getting to Coney. =P 98% chance with bus. 80% chance without it. they are tough looking dudes. probably one of the two gangs with the oldest and strongest looking people.

B. This would be very interesting. These guys are wussies but we havent seen them in action, so maybe a cornered hamster can still bite hard. 50% chance.

C. They got guns! lol. naw if they went to the meeting, they wouldnt have anything, not even knives. They could still probably make it. 50% chance.

D. The Furies wouldnt have their bats with them... so that greatly reduces their potential. still, they are good runners. 70% chance

E. The Punks would most likely make it. they are pretty much big and real tough all around. the only ones that gave the Warriors a real good fight in the movie. 80% chance

F. uh... once Luther realizes his mistake, the Riffs would be all over the Rogues. :lol: 0% chance

User avatar
Cochise
Rank: Punk
Posts: 154
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 3:35 am
Location: California

What if another gang was blamed by the Rogues????

Post by Cochise »

And...this topic makes sense, how? So, Luther blames another gang, whose turf also happens to be Coney? I think it'd be the same, just with name swaps.

I mean, if Luther had blamed another gang regardless of who, they'd be our main characters, not the Warriors.
When we get there; that's when we've made it.

ohs
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 339
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 7:01 pm
Location: AZ.

What if another gang was blamed by the Rogues????

Post by ohs »

hmm interesting..so if it was 9 members from each..

Orphans - what a bunch of tirds, they will get wiped out no problem.


Lizzies - well from what I saw in the movie when they try to take out cochise,vermin and rembrandt....half of the lizzies just sit and watch while the ones that do fight look un-experienced. Without guns they are toast. Personally I wouldnt be able to decide what to do..make love or..


Furies - hmm this is a tough one, I bet some gangs wont even mess with them when they see all the baseball bats. Six of them will make it back.


Punks - They all get wasted except for the dood on rollerskates, after escaping the meeting into the graveyard he keeps going while the rest of his gang catches their breath..weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee


Turnbulls - they sure looked mean, if they have their bus then no sweat, but on foot Ill say half make it back.


Rogues - If the Rogues did it and were caught right away at the meeting? Luther would say Cropsey did it! 8 of the 9 make it back.
Last edited by ohs on Thu Sep 22, 2005 5:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
[img]http://members.cox.net/thewarriors/box420x90.gif[/img]

chef
Rank: Destroyer
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 10:57 pm
Location: australia

What if another gang was blamed by the Rogues????

Post by chef »

luther wouldnt know the orphans existed would he? they arent in the same network and wernt there.

SkateXer99
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 275
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:56 am
Location: California

What if another gang was blamed by the Rogues????

Post by SkateXer99 »

...then it wouldn't be called The Warriors. And whoever Luther did blame, you'd still ask "What if this gang wasn't blamed by Luther?"


But still, it's possibly Luther could've seen the other guy who witnessed him shoot Cyrus, it was really a matter of who got seen first. So it was Fox.

saner
Rank: Hurricane
Posts: 143
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 3:32 pm

What if another gang was blamed by the Rogues????

Post by saner »

this is a WHAT IF scenarios. cant you tell?

geez ohs is the only one who understands this topic.
:lol:

ohs
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 339
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 7:01 pm
Location: AZ.

What if another gang was blamed by the Rogues????

Post by ohs »

quaid...quaaaaid...open your mind..open your miiiiind
[img]http://members.cox.net/thewarriors/box420x90.gif[/img]

User avatar
The Rogue
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 531
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 1:06 am
Location: The Bronx

What if another gang was blamed by the Rogues????

Post by The Rogue »

in the case that the warriors werent blamed but indeed a nother gang then:

turnbulls: chances are they would just drive home and not have to deal with the fury's or punks but on the beach luther would have shot all of them before the riffs got there.

orphan's: they werent there so they coulnt be blamed

the lizzies: they would have been caught probably bye the turnbulls or they wouldnt have been able to punch threw the fence.

the fury's: probably would have gotten 2-3 safely home before getting shot on the beach

the punks: after the split up they would have died

the rogues: luther would have shot all 5 remaining bullets in the angry mob before getting beaten to death.

emissary
Scout
Scout
Posts: 1448
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 1:59 am

What if another gang was blamed by the Rogues????

Post by emissary »

Well, while we're on the subject, what if there was a second shooter?
"When we see the ocean we figure we're home, we're safe."

saner
Rank: Hurricane
Posts: 143
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 3:32 pm

What if another gang was blamed by the Rogues????

Post by saner »

a second shooter. what do you mean. oh like another gang wanting to shoot too? that would be tough for both gangs to shoot at the ssametime. I think another shooter would not fire if they see shot has already been fired.

or if you mean what if another gang shot the Riffs leader instead of the Rogues. it would probably be the Gladiators. :P

SkateXer99
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 275
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:56 am
Location: California

What if another gang was blamed by the Rogues????

Post by SkateXer99 »

A member of the Riffs did it.

But they wont fight themselves or send out an assasination on their own gang, so chaos would run a mock and the Riffs would all seperate, and all the other gangs would go on a frenzy.

That, or just find who shot Cyrus and kill him. :)

User avatar
Hippy
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 695
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 3:38 am
Location: Stockton California

Re: What if another gang was blamed by the Rogues????

Post by Hippy »

saner wrote:what if Luther didnt say the Warriors did it?

what if he said:

A. "The Turnbulls A.C.s did it!"

B, "The Orphans did it!"

C. "The Lizzies did it!"

D. "The Baseball Furies did it!"

E. "The Punks did it!"

F. "The Rogues did it!" ;)
A. hte Turnbulls could make home. Who the hells gonna stop About 20 guys with 2x4's?
b. The Orphans are too far down the list to know they did anything. Besides they are so far down a Slign shot would be the Weapon not a Gun

c.LIzzies...........not too sure how to do that one.

D. BB would use a Baseball and hit a homer at cyrus

e. The Punks could do the same except the leader would die after rollerblaing down a flight of stairs
Always be awhile, Not here much so don\'t expect much of a response

User avatar
The Rogue
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 531
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 1:06 am
Location: The Bronx

What if another gang was blamed by the Rogues????

Post by The Rogue »

there would only be 9 turnbulls not 20 cause if there turf was coney then they coulnt get reinforcments like they did in the movie

User avatar
T'MorrowMan
Rank: Orphan
Posts: 31
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 12:16 am
Location: Union Sqr- Los Angeles

another gang wouldnt work

Post by T'MorrowMan »

Then the movie would've been called "The Turnbull A.C.'s" and no one would have known what the crap that meant!
"It's just our mark..It don't mean we're at war..."

User avatar
back2coney
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 680
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 7:33 pm
Location: London

What if another gang was blamed by the Rogues????

Post by back2coney »

Orphans and Lizzies wern't at the meet, and yeah I guess it wouldn't have been called the warriors and thus would not have been as awesome.

However the truce was off, they still would have had to bop the orphans and some others, but gangs would not have specifically been hunting them down....not as cool.
" Real tough mothers ain't ya! "


[img]http://looksy.co.uk/files/images/rare22_1_0.jpg[/img]

Post Reply