The Warriors Movie Site Forum

Why in the world werent they at the meeting they had a heavy rep and were on the riffs network

They were at the meeting.  You can see at least three of them.

then how the heck did they get back so fast *Cough* Steroids *Cough*... hmm what me i said nothing  8)

They didn't get back so fast.  The ones that the warriors fought with were other members of the furies that didn't attend the conclave.  Remember: only nine members were represented at the conclave; not the whole gang.

If each gangs leader (warlord) was at the conclave, would that make the yellow faced fury be only second in command, being that he wasnt at the conclave?? :-k :-k :-k

Ajax 4494 wrote: Why in the world werent they at the meeting they had a heavy rep and were on the riffs network

Well, Good Question, but Search Next Time.
Even if, I've to say, it's not so easy to find out this Thread.
Anyway...
http://warriorsmovie.co.uk/forum/http:/ ... 05#p111005
... and...
http://warriorsmovie.co.uk/forum/http:/ ... 54#p111054 ---> Well, the Topic is about another "Thing", but there you can see a Furie at The Conclave.
See ya bopper. 8)

Ninth Delegate wrote:
If each gangs leader (warlord) was at the conclave, would that make the yellow faced fury be only second in command

Geez, all this time, I thought the yellow face was the leader.   He-e-e-e-e-ehllo!  lol

Ninth Delegate wrote: They didn't get back so fast.  The ones that the warriors fought with were other members of the furies that didn't attend the conclave.  Remember: only nine members were represented at the conclave; not the whole gang. <--- (1) <--- POINT

If each gangs leader (warlord) was at the conclave, would that make the yellow faced fury be only second in command, being that he wasnt at the conclave?? :-k :-k :-k <--- (2) <--- <--- POINT

I want to quote ND, too. About the "Point" 1: This should be True (and Yeah, I agree). But I'd also have another question, just to "Complicate" the Whole Thing. So, do you guys think other Gangs didn't get back so fast Like (100% Like) The Warriors? I mean, I've always thought The Warriors somehow wasted their Time in order to get the Subway (Turnbull ACs Turf). You know very well those Scenes... the Rain One... and All the Rest...

"Point" 2: BTW, Excellent Point ND, I posted it in another Topic (don't rem now where). But Yeah, again, Excellent Point!!!
So, Dangerous or not, The WarLords, just everyone, had to be at The Conclave. It was Too Important!!! I mean, No Chance for the 2nd (WarChief etc...) ... and I think we both agree about This, ND. Right?
But anyway, about This I also want to say:  :-k :-k :-k :-k :-k :-k
100% True??? Or Not??? Who really knows???

We should Just ask this Walter Hill!!! ::) ::) ::)


Now, maybe This could help us. If you guys "Scan" the Photos from this Link (I Posted it in my Post above)... http://warriorsmovie.co.uk/forum/http:/ ... 54#p111054
... you can see how the Yellow Furie at The Conclave and The Yellow Furie (Chase Scene) are not the same Person/Character. Look at the "Black" Eyes. His Right Eye for The "First", His Left for "The Second"... and also their Faces are different. That's for Sure. Oh, and look at the Lips: Black Painted? Only The "Second".
I mean, This could Confirm (or at the Same Time, it could also "not to have" any Meaning) The Yellow Furie/Chase Scene wasn't-or was (so he wasn't or was The WarLord) at The Conclave.
But, if he was... two Yellow Face Furies in The Bronx? Smart or stupid Move? Or was it just by chance? Even if about the last Question, I don't just think so!!!

So, ND, once again I also "Say": :-k :-k :-k :-k :-k :-k ::) 8)

So were the Furies that the Warriors fought the same Furies that attended the Conclave? I think they were the same. It's interesting at the conclave only one or two furies can be seen at a time, but never all 9 together.

flashman wrote: So were the Furies that the Warriors fought the same Furies that attended the Conclave? I think they were the same. It's interesting at the conclave only one or two furies can be seen at a time, but never all 9 together.

Most of the gangs split up at the conclave.  Watching the conclave scene again, you dont really see any more than four or five members of the same gang together.  You can see them scattered all over.

If you were a baseball furie, your going to get noticed waiting on a platform for a train home.  Its not like you can blend into the crowd.  I wouldnt have thought many other gang members would have made it to a train before the warriors.  Remember the first dj scene and the nowhere to run montage; we see the furies come out of their club house. I doubt the furies at the conclave could have got back so soon for them to be the same ones in that scene.  And who knows what gang members were racked up by the cops.  Who's to say all 9 furies at the conclave escaped from the police? 

This is what I like about the forum; you start of with a simple question and it opens up all other theories.  I always found it a little uncredible that all 9 rogues escape the conclave, even though one has just been KOed by cleon and their mode of transport isn't exactly inconspicuous.  I would definatly have had some cops waiting by the rogues hearse.  Or maybe there was only 8 rogues at the conclave and the ninth stayed in the car as a getaway driver?  I'll have to try and count them the next time I watch the film.

In my opinion, with the exception of the rogues, I think none of the gang members that the warriors confront on the way home were at the conclave, as they all look a little too fresh to have travelled that far whilst evaiding the cops.  Even the riffs at coney were the ones standing in formation at the riffs hangout (im under the impression they were the ones NOT at the conclave.  The riffs are the biggest gang after all).
Something for you all to ponder on.  Whats everyone elses opinion?

I concur.

When I made my remark about yellow-faced Fury, I forgot to mention the same theory about the Punks.  Now, I got a feeling that most people think the Punk on the skates was the leader.  He wasn't, if the leaders of each gang went to the conclave.  Could the Punks have gotten back home so quickly?  No.  During the Nowhere to Run, we clearly see "Skate" at the pub with his brothers, drinking a beer.  And they ran Lower Mid-Town.  No, Conrad Sheehan would have played Punks' 2nd in Command, as did Jerry Hewitt for the Furies.

As in DC, when the president leaves town, vice-pres stays behind to hold down the fort in case something happens to the pres.

I always considered the skating punk to be something simular to Fox's role as a scout, being that he's ahead of the rest of his gang and he's got speed and agility.  If I was leader of the punks (be it first or second in command)  I wouldnt want to risk my troops being leaderless by going off alone and risk getting wrecked.  I would send a scout to gather info and report back before making a decision.

My conspiracy theroy is that the Rogues were working for the police to asassinate Cyrus. The Police new what Cyrus was up to,but couldn't get anybody close to him. He was to guarded even for the police.

The police could have helped the Rogues escape. Later when Luther is talking to someone on the phone it could have been the police as Luther says (were set) to cropsey as if to say there getting paid to have done the job. Now all they have to do to get paid is to stop the Warriors and tie up the loose ends.

the furies that were at the conclave were differant too the ones the warriors fought

Ninth Delegate wrote: I always considered the skating punk to be something simular to Fox's role as a scout, being that he's ahead of the rest of his gang and he's got speed and agility.  If I was leader of the punks (be it first or second in command)  I wouldnt want to risk my troops being leaderless by going off alone and risk getting wrecked.  I would send a scout to gather info and report back before making a decision.

Thatsa very good point, 9th.

In the Super 8mm reel of the movie, it shows more Furies.