Page 1 of 1
Would Masai do the same.
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 12:50 pm
by nazzac
Would have Masai tried to take over the city like cyrus?
Re: Would Masai do the same.
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 9:38 pm
by stevo2k6
nazzac wrote:
Would have Masai tried to take over the city like cyrus?
he didnt seem like the type of guy that would do that, inf act we dont really know mesai as a character one thing we do know is that he defo gets his revenge if owt goes wrong.
he came across as more tough than cyrus, although cyrus is "magic, whole lotta magic"
Re: Would Masai do the same.
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 1:28 am
by Cowboy606
honestly, he seemed to be the type of guy who would think more realisticly than cyrus, but we cant be sure cause there just wasn't enough of him given to us in the movie to make an accurate guess.
Re: Would Masai do the same.
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 1:28 pm
by stevo2k6
Cowboy606 wrote:
honestly, he seemed to be the type of guy who would think more realisticly than cyrus, but we cant be sure cause there just wasn't enough of him given to us in the movie to make an accurate guess.
exactly
so we cant make a real decision about that
Re: Would Masai do the same.
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 4:18 pm
by Ajax7
IMO i dont think that cyrus was just trying to take over the city... I thought he was trying to end the fighting by uniting all the gangs, having one huge fight with the police and then yeh they would have taken over the city..... but guess what.... no more fighting. And in answer to your question, No, masai was more realistic.
Re: Would Masai do the same.
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 6:20 pm
by Luther828
Didn't I create this topic before?
http://warriorsmovie.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=10711.0
Maybe that was different; no problem if you have.
And to answer your question I don't think he would have. Like Ajax7 said he was much more of a realistic and he just didn't have that thing that cyrus had.
Re: Would Masai do the same.
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 7:49 pm
by nazzac
Luther828 wrote:
Didn't I create this topic before?
http://warriorsmovie.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=10711.0
Maybe that was different; no problem if you have.
And to answer your question I don't think he would have. Like Ajax7 said he was much more of a realistic and he just didn't have that thing that cyrus had.
Mine means would Masai try to take over thr city, and run it. Yours is about the truce which means no fighting.
Re: Would Masai do the same.
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 7:51 pm
by Luther828
Ok, no problem. I see the difference now
Re: Would Masai do the same.
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 8:51 pm
by The Swan
Ok let's say indeed yours are different Topics, in Luther828's I answered Masai wouldn't have carried on the Truce, cause he was more of a realistic Man.
So Nazzac, about your Topic: I think Masai would not even have thought about a Great Meeting. Don't misunderstand me, he would have tried to run the City... but in a different way.
Re: Would Masai do the same.
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 11:44 pm
by stevo2k6
The Swan wrote:
Ok let's say indeed yours are different Topics, in Luther828's I answered Masai wouldn't have carried on the Truce, cause he was more of a realistic Man.
So Nazzac, about your Topic: I think Masai would not even have thought about a Great Meeting. Don't misunderstand me, he would have tried to run the City... but in a different way.
theswan has nailed it in the head once more well done
Re: Would Masai do the same.
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 9:12 am
by The Swan
Thanks a lot bro, anyway I've to say both really are Very Good Topics... so, it was just a Pleasure!!! 8)
Re: Would Masai do the same.
Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 10:27 am
by The Swan
Scurvy Dog wrote:
I don't think Masai would do any differently than what Cyrus would REALLY do. I think the truce was simply a ploy to bring every gang under the control of the Riffs. He was selling unity to everyone - but what they were really buying was a dictatorship.
They would have discovered this the first time they tried to do anything independently from Cyrus' authority.
This is anyway true, that night all the Gangs were under The Riffs. No problems, the Reason wasn't "Contestable". But sooner or later, even if to Rule the City wasn't "Contestable" too, we would have seen some "LITTLE" rebellion. 8)