Rembrandt....completely useless?

BTW A.K.A the killer household appliance · Tue Oct 18, 2005 3:27 pm

Harley wrote:Why must everyone pick on poor Rembrandt!

because hes so puncheable! lolol

nah, jokin harley!

Post by **SoldierHeavyMuscle** » Tue Oct 18, 2005 3:34 pm

bobo the warrior wrote:
Harley wrote:Why must everyone pick on poor Rembrandt!
because hes so puncheable! lolol nah, jokin harley!

ok, that's just funny!!!! no matter how ya slice it!

emissary · Post by **emissary** » Tue Oct 18, 2005 10:12 pm

I support Rembrandt. And as for the last time I examined the movie closely. I am confident that my dialogue knowledge(of this film) matches anybody in the world. Am I the only one who sees cowboy as a terrible fighter? Rembrandt knocked the punks leader down with a solid punch! Where does all this Fox support come from? Anyway, at least we agree on the value of Ajax.

CompanyScum · Post by **CompanyScum** » Tue Oct 18, 2005 11:35 pm

bobo the warrior wrote:
SkateXer99 wrote:You never saw him after he was thrown into the mirror.
because he was knocked down, end of story.

Yeah, I saw Vermin on the floor knocked out.
I watched in in slow-mo, and I saw it over and over.

Mercy · Post by **Mercy** » Sun Oct 23, 2005 5:01 am

" The chicks are packed, the chicks are packed " Who better to say this? Who better than the weak one? the one who doesn't fall into the trapp of the lizzies, he HAD TO BE THERE, think about it...

Wolverine · Post by **Wolverine** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 3:13 am

I think Rembrandt is in there to show how tightly unified this group is, as are most gangs. He might be considered the 'little brother type' but everyone had his back, and nobdy talked down to him. He's just apart of the family.

SNOWGIRL79 · Post by **SNOWGIRL79** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 3:49 am

Wolverine wrote:I think Rembrandt is in there to show how tightly unified this group is, as are most gangs. He might be considered the 'little brother type' but everyone had his back, and nobdy talked down to him. He's just apart of the family.

That's EXACTLY how I see Rembrandt too.

For those of you who've seen the classic "Rebel Without A Cause", Rembrant's character sorta reminds me of the late Sal Mineo's character "Plato." He basically is looked upon as a "little" brother. Only Rembrant is a tad bit tougher. LOL

Rembrant is COOL with me. 8)

Harley · Post by **Harley** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 3:53 am

They actually refer to Rembrandt as Plato in the original script before his name was changed!

Love me! LOVE DOPEFISH! · Fri Oct 28, 2005 4:06 am

The Lizzies scene ALONE is enough to constitute Rembrandt's existence.

Think about it.

That Lizzie could've made a straight slash to Cochise's throat if he wasn't warned.

Or, at the very least, right through the jugular vein, which would lead him to bleeding to death soon afterwards.

Vermin would've gotten blown away, and, if Rembrandt hadn't taken that slash, Vermin would've been gutted, and THEN shot.

Which would lead to Swan, Cowboy, Snow, and Mercy being the only ones left standing for the washroom scene.

Which would result in a massacre, not a fight.

And anybody who complains that Rembrandt was a wimp for not fighting: That was a razor sharp blade. That was not a flesh wound, and the slash was intended for a target much deeper than his arm. It possibly could've even gone straight through to the bone, it wouldn't be unheard of. Now, I don't know about you, but I wouldn't be too great at fighting with my arm slashed open.

SNOWGIRL79 · Post by **SNOWGIRL79** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 4:08 am

Harley wrote:They actually refer to Rembrandt as Plato in the original script before his name was changed!

WOW! I didn't know that. That's so cool.

MercysPinkTop · Post by **MercysPinkTop** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 4:19 am

Dopefish wrote:The Lizzies scene ALONE is enough to constitute Rembrandt's existence.

Think about it.

That Lizzie could've made a straight slash to Cochise's throat if he wasn't warned.

Or, at the very least, right through the jugular vein, which would lead him to bleeding to death soon afterwards.

Vermin would've gotten blown away, and, if Rembrandt hadn't taken that slash, Vermin would've been gutted, and THEN shot.

Which would lead to Swan, Cowboy, Snow, and Mercy being the only ones left standing for the washroom scene.

Which would result in a massacre, not a fight.

And anybody who complains that Rembrandt was a wimp for not fighting: That was a razor sharp blade. That was not a flesh wound, and the slash was intended for a target much deeper than his arm. It possibly could've even gone straight through to the bone, it wouldn't be unheard of. Now, I don't know about you, but I wouldn't be too great at fighting with my arm slashed open.

I hope this is a joke. I'm new here buddy, so maybe you were being sarcastic and I missed it, anyways... To have Rembrandt as a Warrior for unforseen ridiculous circumstances, such as protecting the Warriors at the Lizzies when other Warriors might be preoccupied, that's just absurd. Rembrandt sucks but he can paint a "W" like apparently no other Warrior can. That's it. End of story.

The little brother angle might have merit but Rembrandt sucks as a Warrior.

Lady · Post by **Lady** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:06 pm

MercysPinkTop wrote: To have Rembrandt as a Warrior for unforseen ridiculous circumstances, such as protecting the Warriors at the Lizzies when other Warriors might be preoccupied, that's just absurd. Rembrandt sucks but he can paint a "W" like apparently no other Warrior can. That's it. End of story.

The little brother angle might have merit but Rembrandt sucks as a Warrior.

I just can't imagine that he sucks as a Warrior, or why else would he have been chosen to be among the 9 that went to the meeting? There's more to helping out the group than being a good fighter--look at Ajax, the best fighter among them most likely, but unable to think ahead enough to realize there's something weird about a pretty lady on a park bench all alone at night. Rembrandt was level-headed enough not to get seduced by the Lizzies, and he threw a good punch during the fight in the bathroom. That's something, right?

(I'm new here too, of course, so that's just my two cents.)

clerk · Post by **clerk** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 5:12 pm

I thought the same, he just chickens out of fighting to help his fellow gang, but i guess they need him because he is the main tagger so non of the other warriors hafto worry about doing it.

emissary · Post by **emissary** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 8:29 pm

You know something, Rembrandt just might have swung that Punks fight in the Warriors favor. The punks leader was a good fighter but to have spray paint shot into your eyes would decrease anybody's effectiveness. And since the Warriors were fighting at the end of a very tough night, a Punk's leader who had not been equalized, might have done some Ajax-like damage to the Warriors or worse with that knife.

Youngblood · Post by **Youngblood** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 10:03 pm

I hope this is a joke. I'm new here buddy, so maybe you were being sarcastic and I missed it, anyways... To have Rembrandt as a Warrior for unforseen ridiculous circumstances, such as protecting the Warriors at the Lizzies when other Warriors might be preoccupied, that's just absurd. Rembrandt sucks but he can paint a "W" like apparently no other Warrior can. That's it. End of story.

The little brother angle might have merit but Rembrandt sucks as a Warrior

thats stupid if rembrant want der vermin and cochise would be ded![/quote][/code]

The Warriors Movie Site Forum