do you think the furies would have done better in the furie

Swan Owns All · Post by **Swan Owns All** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:32 am

they weren't packing bats? When you think about it, the fight was 9 vs 4 and the 9 were all twirling bats around and still couldn't manage to win the fight. The bats were actually later used against the furies by the 4 warriors.

Do you think if it was an unarmed figth the furies would have won?
idk but at least the warriors wouldn't have been able to do more damage with the bats then the furies.

warlord jp · Post by **warlord jp** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:39 am

There is a pretty simple answer to this thread NO!!!! lol, they are baseball players arent they, and baseball players specialty is to swing theyre bat, if with their special weapons they coudnt defeat the warriors, just imagine in a fist fight. Or maybe the warriors were already trained on how to defend themselves against packed gang members, since they did so well in that fight.

Swan Owns All · Post by **Swan Owns All** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:45 am

warlord jp wrote: There is a pretty simple answer to this thread NO!!!! lol, they are baseball players arent they, and baseball players specialty is to swing theyre bat, if with their special weapons they coudnt defeat the warriors, just imagine in a fist fight. Or maybe the warriors were already trained on how to defend themselves against packed gang members, since they did so well in that fight.

hmmmm....But they couldn't even swing the bats too well. In a fist fight i could imagine them all ganging up in twos on each warriors....oh wait 3's cause cowboy would get knocked out again. they would grab them and elbow the warriors similar to cleons defeat. better then just standing around with a bat ready to get killed.

Oxygen · Post by **Oxygen** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:50 pm

Swan Owns All wrote:
warlord jp wrote: There is a pretty simple answer to this thread NO!!!! lol, they are baseball players arent they, and baseball players specialty is to swing theyre bat, if with their special weapons they coudnt defeat the warriors, just imagine in a fist fight. Or maybe the warriors were already trained on how to defend themselves against packed gang members, since they did so well in that fight.
hmmmm....But they couldn't even swing the bats too well. In a fist fight i could imagine them all ganging up in twos on each warriors....oh wait 3's cause cowboy would get knocked out again. they would grab them and elbow the warriors similar to cleons defeat. better then just standing around with a bat ready to get killed.

If 9 bat wielding Furies couldn't beat 4 unarmed Warriors there just gonna lose even worse if they were also unarmed.Being unarmed wouldn't make you stronger,if the furies didn't have bats, Cowboy probably wouldn't have gotten knocked down.The Furies were good.The Warriors were better.That's all there is to it.

Swan Owns All · Post by **Swan Owns All** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 3:26 pm

Oxygen wrote:
Swan Owns All wrote:
warlord jp wrote: There is a pretty simple answer to this thread NO!!!! lol, they are baseball players arent they, and baseball players specialty is to swing theyre bat, if with their special weapons they coudnt defeat the warriors, just imagine in a fist fight. Or maybe the warriors were already trained on how to defend themselves against packed gang members, since they did so well in that fight.
hmmmm....But they couldn't even swing the bats too well. In a fist fight i could imagine them all ganging up in twos on each warriors....oh wait 3's cause cowboy would get knocked out again. they would grab them and elbow the warriors similar to cleons defeat. better then just standing around with a bat ready to get killed.
If 9 bat wielding Furies couldn't beat 4 unarmed Warriors there just gonna lose even worse if they were also unarmed.Being unarmed wouldn't make you stronger,if the furies didn't have bats, Cowboy probably wouldn't have gotten knocked down.The Furies were good.The Warriors were better.That's all there is to it.

most likely but not necessarily because the bats were eventually used against the furies. they could be better at boxing then swinging bats. bats=even out the playing field.

Cowboy606 · Post by **Cowboy606** » Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:27 am

i think the fight showed that the furies had alot of honor because, bats or not, they still attacked each warrior one by one rather than ganging up on them. so if they fought the same way (one on one) without bats, i think they would have still gotten beat.

ajax soldier · Post by **ajax soldier** » Fri Oct 27, 2006 4:55 am

come on man lets face it.
THEY R CRAP FIGHTERS AN WILL NEVA B AS GOOD AS WARRIORS!
I dnt no y they are so popular.
for what reason
they cant even rumble
when they hav weapons and the others dnt. and theres lik 10 of dem. warriors:4-1(cowboy)

stevo2k6 · Post by **stevo2k6** » Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:01 am

yeah they were crap they shud have just piled on them instead of one on one thats jus plain stupid

Swan Owns All · Post by **Swan Owns All** » Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:25 pm

stevo2k6 wrote: yeah they were crap they shud have just piled on them instead of one on one thats jus plain stupid

word. forget the honor, just bull rush em. and yeah idk why they are so popular considering none of them can even decently rumble.

Warlord Bandit · Post by **Warlord Bandit** » Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:41 pm

Heres what i think they should have done. While ajax was looking at the first fury some other one should have swinged at his legs knocking little ajax down. Then they all could have started beating on him.
Buts thats what i think

Swan Owns All · Post by **Swan Owns All** » Fri Oct 27, 2006 4:59 pm

Warlord Bandit wrote: Heres what i think they should have done. While ajax was looking at the first fury some other one should have swinged at his legs knocking little ajax down. Then they all could have started beating on him.
Buts thats what i think

I know but they should stood there!!

::)
and you don't even need to swing for the legs, really anywhere but don't just stand there. I am sure a powerful hit to the ribs, hips, or neck would bring little A down shaking in pain and shock 8)
then swan and snow by themselves would be cake

DesperateDude · Post by **DesperateDude** » Sat Oct 28, 2006 12:10 am

The Furies dropped the ball when they just stood around watching their members being taken down one-by-one. The fight was 8 on 3 at one point and they didnt bumrush at least one member of the Warriors. In a hand to hand fight they would have received the same beating.

emissary · Post by **emissary** » Sat Oct 28, 2006 11:45 am

The Furies didn't have a good general. They could have had 4 guys planted around the corner from where the Warriors were forced to run and then...Ambush. But they got strung out and tired. Who knows what kind of awful cardiovascular shape they were in.

Swan Owns All · Post by **Swan Owns All** » Sat Oct 28, 2006 1:52 pm

emissary wrote: The Furies didn't have a good general. They could have had 4 guys planted around the corner from where the Warriors were forced to run and then...Ambush. But they got strung out and tired. Who knows what kind of awful cardiovascular shape they were in.

that's what i was thinking. Instead of them just standing around near the lights they should have had at least 3 guys at the part where the 4 warriors run to, to slow them down and finish them off right there. I guess their leader wasn't up to Swan's craftyness and street smart level. Although the the furies were obviously in better shape then Cowboy to be able to catch him and ajax.

P.S. baseball players aren't known for there cardiovascular conditioning

Warriorfan54321 · Post by **Warriorfan54321** » Sun Nov 05, 2006 4:46 am

the furies were missing the point, shall we gang up all at once and take them out easy,or shall we take them one on one and we could still get our butts kicked, i think one on one.
if i was in that situation id get all the furies that were there and beat em all down together.
the furies just wernt thinking at that time.

The Warriors Movie Site Forum

do you think the furies would have done better in the furie

do you think the furies would have done better in the furie

Re: do you think the furies would have done better in the fu

Re: do you think the furies would have done better in the fu

Re: do you think the furies would have done better in the fu

Re: do you think the furies would have done better in the fu

Re: do you think the furies would have done better in the fu

Re: do you think the furies would have done better in the fu

Re: do you think the furies would have done better in the furie fight if....

Re: do you think the furies would have done better in the fu

Re: do you think the furies would have done better in the fu

Re: do you think the furies would have done better in the fu

Re: do you think the furies would have done better in the fu

Re: do you think the furies would have done better in the fu

Re: do you think the furies would have done better in the fu

Re: do you think the furies would have done better in the fu